Guideline for Reviewer

Reviewers are responsible for conducting scientific criticism by reading and evaluating texts in a specific scientific field, then providing constructive suggestions and feedback to authors on submitted articles. They discuss the strengths and weaknesses of an article and try to help improve the strength and quality of the text.

Before the review process:

1. Check whether the article is relevant to your subject area.

2. Do you have time to review the article?

3. Are there any conflicts of interest?

Review Process:

1. Title: Is the article illustrated?

2. Abstract: Does it reflect the content of the article?

3. Introduction: Have you explained the accuracy of the material submitted in the article? The introduction should summarize the relevant context of the research and explain the findings. It should explain the experiment, hypothesis, and methods.

4. Methods: Have the authors clearly and comprehensively explained how the data were collected? Was the theoretical basis sufficient for the research? Was the sample size sufficient? Were any new methods used?

5. Results: The study should explain the findings. Was the analysis clear? Was statistical tools used?

6. Discussion: Did the authors compare the results with previous research? Do the results contradict previous theories?

7. Conclusion: Does this explain how better research can be conducted in the next stage?

Guidelines can be found at the following link:

Reviewer Guidelines

Article Assessment Form